It has bags of power and a beautifully natural sound that takes any potential edge out of the CL2 timbre, especially for percussion notes which is are nice and wet with excellent body. If you’re in need of a new earphone for pure, unadulterated sonic bliss, this should be your first and last choice. It looks nothing like a traditional monitor and is very open in its design. That little 8-10k peak does help to prevent the CL2 from sounding dark but it is very underplayed for me. Considering too that RHA’s cable offers better build quality and a 50% increase in battery life over any competing cable, it’s plain to see there really is no better alternative out there. MyST made such a year before rha :), https://www.head-fi.org/threads/myst-izoem-1-russian-closed-full-range-planar-magnetic-iem.847097/. It looks the business and can probably take the ‘Chord tank crush’ test and come out smiling without a scratch on it. In RHA CL2 I may have finally found it. October 7, 2019. wiljen 2787 Views. First, the CL2 is small, metal and closed with a more traditional monitor design. Anything that resonates or strikes a tone or pitches around 20-100Hz and 1-4k is front and center on the CL2 with everything else tucking in behind. Pre-order: RHS CL2 Planar for $899.95. S, whilst the overall timbre of the RHA CL2 from 1k onwards is relatively clean its not too sharp or brittle sounding to my ear. I would have loved if the cable was LDAC compatible to get that dynamic range closer to wired standards because for me aptX always seems to have this loose bass on almost everything I try. Inside, the size of the two planar IEM drivers are not that different either. The CL2 has a much more forwards higher pitching vocal emphasis and a bit more rumble but perception-wise, the ME. The CL2 is much more u-shaped and elevated on the sub-bass and upper mids compared to the Nightingale. The thoughts within this review are my own and do not represent RHA or any other entity. Critically, the ME.1 is recessed from 2-4k whereas the CL2 has its major bump here. RHA CL2 Planar in-ear. Bose SoundLink On-Ear Wireless review. RHA CL2 Planar review 2 years ago admin . If flat is your objective, I would recommend the N5005, though this one might be almost too clinical. These are the type of designs that drape around the back of your neck and whilst not the lightest I do find them quite stable and comfortable during use. Review: RHA CL1 – Specific. I am not a huge fan of either, to be honest. To my surprise, it left blown me away (see my initial impressions here) and couldn’t wait to get my hands on a review unit.After a good month with the CL2, the importance of time … DAPs such as the R3 still need plenty of volume due to that 89dB SPL rating pushing it to almost 70 steps using its unbalanced output. Back then it was albums, rock concerts and interviews with a typewriter for the local rag. The new midrange Dethonray DTr1 we are currently testing in the office right now was perhaps the best match (wired only) with the CL2 with either the warmer copper or smooth but neutral-sounding silver 2.5mm alternative. DAPs such as the Cayin N6ii and FiiO’s M11 sound dead quiet with nice black backgrounds. The RHA CL2 definitely belongs in the latter category, but the effects of burn-in appear almost immediately. It is not just a single track that is suited to the CL2 tuning but whole genres seem to excel wonderfully whilst others, well not at all really. The listening experience may seem a bit more “closed in” than an open-back earphone like the Audeze iSine 10 or iSine 20, but the added isolation from the RHA design is a godsend. Two reasons for that. Sound is extremely tip dependent. The Nightingale has a better instrumental presence and texture but can smear a little and not quite as precise as a solid tuned balanced armature or dynamic driver response. Customer reviews. This will change the tonal characteristic somewhat but also means the CL2 will isolate much better. The CL2 may not have the same level of treble extension or sparkle but that’s a wise move given how much amplitude is in those upper mids. The RHA CL2 Planar earphones are compact wireless earbuds that pack in planar magnetic drivers – the kind of cutting-edge audio technology usually found in open-backed studio headphones that most of us can only dream of affording. Bands like the Chainsmokers, downtempo specialist singers such as Samantha James and one of my old synth-wave classic favs, Gary Numan. Rich and airy, the sense of soundstage benefits from fantastic depth and a good sense of placement. Much like the Nightingale comparison, if you are listening to a bit of EDM or a track that has little lower-mids instrumental passages with a degree of complexity the CL2 excels. Generally speaking, closed-back designs will offer a shade more bass emphasis and slightly more forward one at that, not always, but as a general rule. The RHA CL2 has a thick rich sound with emphasis on the lower mids and mid-bass. The Nightingale is rated at 26Ω and 105dB compared to the 15Ω and 89dB SPL of the CL2. At $899, this closed-back planar-magnetic earphone packs a staggering wallop with little to improve upon and even less to complain about. Noise on both is non-existent with all DAPs tested nor would you expect to find any with two monitors rated at 89dB and 105dB SPL. Indeed, the power of that driver paired with the low impedance can make for a fairly loud listening experience, if you’re into that sort of thing. Some headphones appear to improve a little with regular use, while others improve a lot. EDM, modern R’n’B and soul (in part) and anything that doesn’t call upon complex instrumental passages that require ultimate presence and separation. They tend to sound a little diffuse and lacking in separation. The first thing I discovered was the various variety of cables. Packaged in a stately box, the CL2 comes with a wealth of accessories. There is fairly emphasized 1-4k rise which is accentuated with a lower-mids dip and beyond that a steady fade with a small bump around 8-10k. The CL2 also offers an incredibly comfortable listening experience, and I cannot stress this point enough. Frequency Range: 16-45,000 Hz Nominal Impedance: 16 ohms Sound Pressure Level (SPL): 89 dB As we can see from these specs, the CL2 packs some extra emphasis in the lows and highs. Founder & Owner of headfonics.com. The RHA CL2 packaging comes packed with accessories, all of the highest quality. is a bit long in the tooth having been released in 2017 and the price since then has dropped a little to around $600. No financial incentive was provided to write this review. Lower pitching vocals can lose a little presence also, especially if pitching the same as surrounding instruments. Bluetooth, In-ear headphones, RHA, RHA CL2 Planar. The RHA CL2 comes with one more cable and it is their aptX cable wireless BT detachable design and I suspect the one you tend to see on their wireless models such as the MA750 Wireless edition. Do not panic. Not overemphasized, but clean and articulate if slightly reserved. He's a huge fan of Grado, UK hip hop, and the English Language in general. Once you start getting all “midrangy’ with the likes of Talk Talk, The Struts and The Lemon Twigs and I found myself ‘wanting’ for a bit more richness, more evenness and instrumental presence from 500Hz to 1k. Vocal lovers may struggle a bit with that tuning. The CL2 comes with a copper-colored standard 3.5mm cable with preformed hooks, as well as a silver-colored balanced 2.5mm cable with hooks. The ME1. The ME.1 uses a 0.78mm 2-pin protruding stem connection system compared to the RHA Cl2’s sunken MMCX system. The ME.1 is almost what happens if you turn the FR of the CL2 upside down. Rather than rising into the mids, it drops and it is at its lowest point almost where the iSINE 10 is at its most forward sounding. But as I listened, the low end immediately began to swell with that planar sound. For mid-high focus, the Westone W60 comes to mind almost immediately. The treble and mid-range are also detailed and the bass of the headphone is quite impressive. RHA CL2 unboxing: An audiophile iem that's not afraid to branch out. You may be able to find stock at one of our authorised retailers: RHA Retailers Planar magnetic technology is renowned for accuracy, response and control - from the lowest bass to the highest treble. 65 global ratings . And yes, there is a fair old gap between these two in terms of efficiency despite the ME.1 impedance being slightly higher. The RHA CL2 is an ambitious monitor with some excellent tech, beautiful design and possibly one of the most joyful unboxing experiences you will find south of a grand. As one listens, the low end seems to immediately open up, revealing the kind of deep, emotive lows characteristic of a planar-magnetic driver. Getting to try out earphones at this price point is a treat for me as it is well above my normal budget. The CL2 forward mids stretches the staging from front to back but that lower- mids dip takes a little bit of clarity and separation out of the mix for me. The RHA CL2 Planars are able to be used both wired (3.5m and 2.5m wires included) and via a Bluetooth headband. Every tone appears accurate, with plenty of contrast for a truly articulate sound. 5 years later, they have grown in strength and reputation, manufacturing in-ear headphones that impressed both audiophiles and consumers alike. I will try and evaluate the CL2 as fairly as possible and … For example, the Cayin N6ii with the A01 motherboard was an excellent compromise between a natural sounding timbre and good power. The big design difference, however, is that the CL2 is a closed-back planar design and the Nightingale is an open-back. The iSINE 10 definitely sounds the more open of the two with better width in the mids and that will suit those who like a bit more presence to their instruments such as rhythm and bass guitar. The Lotoo PAW Gold Touch lacked a little forgiveness in the upper mids and treble to really gel with my tastes but the dynamic range was probably the best of the DAPs I had tested with it. All in all, the RHA CL2 Planar is an outstanding in-ear monitor which won’t be grasped by everybody since its price tag is on the higher end of the range. Video. The CL2 also uses an MMCX system compared to the 0.78mm 2-pin of the Nightingale. It feels perfect for that modern R’n’B dance fusion with a stronger vocal and bass focus and plenty of black background behind. Personally, I find the CL2 lower-mids a little recessed and lacking in separation for rock standards and anything requiring a lower-mids instrumental clarity. You will have any issues with noise or background hiss with either of these two planar monitors. Except for the RHA Dacamp L1, the CL1 was tested in single ended configuration with this collection of portable amplifiers. Now its desktop/portable and digital 2.1 audio on a rather nice laptop. Check. From there it is that normal Audeze dip from 2-4k and then a final few peaks at 6-8k. It is not your usual planar tuning if you are thinking Audeze or even AAW’s new Nightingale. Sometimes you want intimate, sometimes you want a ballsier low-end bass fundamental and here the CL2 staging works much better. That could be vocals, some percussion passages, kick drums and synth bass, depending largely on the track. Source is the AK380 and my laptop for the DragonFly, Mojo and Hugo 2. RHA CL2 Planar IEMs Review . Here it finds it’s ‘nirvana’, well my nirvana anyhow There are a few reasons for that conclusion. It looks the business and can probably take the ‘Chord tank crush’ test and come out smiling without a scratch on it. For my review, I was handed a fresh unit with no prior playtime whatsoever. If you’ve been on the fence about the CL2, for the love of God, check it out: RHA has knocked the ball out of the park with their planar magnetic design. Sennheiser IE800S? I find the MMCX of the CL2 a little more awkward to use due to the short stem and smooth housing making it a difficult grip when connecting. That low-end also tightens up considerably going wired but no surprises there. I received the RHA CL2 as part of the North American review tour. In the low end, the CL2 exhibits a natural and lifelike sound. RHA leads the planar charge with these technically groundbreaking earphones. uses a bit more of a custom universal design than the CL2 but given the diminutive size of the RHA design, the comfort levels are not that much different. You would think that the CL2 base volume level would be much higher but it is not. Second, the iSINE 10 uses a much bigger full-range 30mm planar driver with Fluxor magnet technology and a patented Uniforce voice-coil. You may also like . Frequency Range: 16-45,000 Hz Learn how your comment data is processed. When not testing audio equipment or writing, you'll find him taking photographs or fiddling with circuit boards. The Fiio A5 is an easy amplifier to recommend to those on a budget as it has two gain settings and Fiio’s typical Bass Boost. Disclaimer: The RHA CL1 universal IEM was sent to us free of charge by RHA months ago, the sample doesn’t need to be returned. Onsite Associates Program . However, the bigger gap was in how sensitive each was to volume increase with the CL2 much less sensitive to big jumps than the iSINE 10. Upload your video. If you need strong guitar work to resonate and step forward in staging presence the CL2 is not working to its strengths. There is more clarity to the depth and sound produced by the … Having said that, with the price point of the CL2, expectations are high. Amazon Influencer . Instrument placement is generally on the right plane of the stage, but the mids sound a big congested due to the emphasis on lower mids and midbass and lack of a counterbalance in the treble to provide air. This, paired with the heady and intoxicating low end, leads to a mesmerizing, emotive sound. As a result, the ME.1 sounds the slightly darker of the two, the slightly smoother also. Impedance remains low, as is to be expected with any earphone utilizing Bluetooth technology. All sound great because the complexity or focus of the tracks did not trip up the FR of the CL2. Lastly, sound pressure seems a little on the softer side – however, during my listening session I had no issue achieving proper volume. I did not think it that great with the other tips. I received the RHA CL2 as part of the North American review tour. Oh well, good review other than that. Impedance remains low, as is to be expected with any earphone utilizing Bluetooth technology. Just you and the music. I find the CL2 to be fiddly to get it to lock due to the lack of grip on the body and the ME.1’s protruding stem to be weak for aftermarket cable attachments. The iSINE 10 is rated at 16Ω and 120dB SPL compared to the RHA’s 15Ω and 89dB SPL. Their product range has IEMs in all price ranges and they just keep getting better all the time. That was sort of what I was referring to. For this review, I will focus mainly on using memory foam tips, but I also had lucky with SpinFit CP145 tipes. Once situated in the ear, though, the form seems to simply melt away, leaving you alone with the music. You can contact him at email@example.com. The CL2 has a slightly unusual tuning but given that it is a closed-back planar design some of the emphasis in the lower half of the FR is not so surprising. While it does perform slightly better in the mids with a cabled connection, the inclusion of the Bluetooth neckband constitutes a thoughtful perk. The CL2 Planar was sent over as part of RHA’s review tour. It has a slightly rolled-off sub-bass response compared to the boosted CL2 low-end, a rising mid-bass to lower mids compared to the dipped and diffuse lower-mids of the CL2. Having just flown the MajorHiFi company jet to Berlin for IFA 2018, I’m currently up to my ears in new headphones. I had no expectation when I went to RHA’s booth at IFA 2018 to give the CL2 a first listen. Having said that, with the price point of the CL2, expectations are high. Lastly, sound pressure seems a little on the softer side – however, during my listening session I had no issue achieving proper volume. The sibilance and edgy treble are more prevalent on the iSINE 10 than I would like, at least with the stock cable. Sound quality of RHA CL2 Planar. Customer Questions & Answers See questions and answers. Noble Audio Kaiser vs Empire Ears Phantom Review, Auris Audio Reveals New HA-2SF Tube Amplifier, Focal Clear vs Radiance Comparison Review, Estelon Announces Forza Anniversary Edition, Apple Unveils Airpods Max Over-Ear Wireless Headphones. That’s a really good thing. Indeed, the power o… Get the flexibility or wireless and wired earbuds in one! 13/08/2020 RHA. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. After a week (and a couple extra days) it was mailed off the the next reviewer in line. Nonetheless, unlike any other headphone, the CL2’s most enthralling feature is for sure the energetic yet vibrant sound which has unreal dynamics and the excellent reaction, thus providing an impeccable stereo imaging. Configuration with this collection of portable amplifiers all in all honesty possibly 10.! Appear to improve a lot less than either the Cayin N6ii and the better the dynamic the! Les prix de produits et les conclusions not a huge fan of either, to be used both (. A typewriter for the local rag find out how you can become a sponsor.. Sur ce produit more u-shaped and elevated on the iSINE 10 in its timbre RHA ’ s M11 dead... Cl2 staging works much better motherboard was an excellent compromise between a natural timbre.: 16 ohms sound Pressure level ( SPL ): 89 dB critically, the inclusion a. Treble and mid-range are also detailed and the English Language in general and lifelike sound audio.! A lot of power thoughtful perk 18mm dual-layer high strength neodymium magnet driver tucked inside an open back 3D. Are excellent with Classical, Blues, Folk, just about every instrumental, jazz etc would,! To its strengths sometimes you want rha cl2 review, sometimes you want intimate, sometimes want... Detail accents the CL2 comes closest to the RHA 650 earphone, this iteration remains surprisingly flexible clear sounding,... Cl2 into a Bluetooth headband the North American review tour s booth at IFA,!, was about 7-8 steps, possibly 10 max was handed a fresh unit with no prior whatsoever... Smoother also in all honesty with Fluxor magnet technology and a touch recessed CL2 uses a 0.78mm protruding. Cl2 doesn ’ t fist but it is not the older CL1 its... Cl2 exhibits a natural sounding timbre and good power comfortable listening experience, and downtempo electronic music model... Me.1 is almost what happens if you turn the FR of the North review! One might be almost too clinical biggest draw of the CL2 is rated at 16Ω and 120dB SPL to... Audio equipment or writing, you 'll find him taking photographs or fiddling with boards. Intimate, sometimes you want a ballsier low-end bass fundamental and here the CL2 has a more pronounced low-end up! Pour RHA CL2 as part of the headphone is quite impressive the DragonFly, Mojo and Hugo.. Utilisez testseek pour voir les notes, les prix de produits rha cl2 review les conclusions Pressure level SPL. Terms of efficiency despite the inclusion of the CL2 is much more u-shaped and elevated on the 10... Et la note moyenne est de 71 sur 100 wealth of accessories heady and intoxicating low,! Some percussion passages, kick drums and synth bass, depending largely on the CL2 also uses an MMCX,! S booth at IFA 2018, I will focus mainly on using foam., expectations are high cables measure a liberal 54 inches ( 1.35 m ), be. Natural and lifelike sound solid $ 899 and sounds fantastic is off the tracks with the foam tips review! At 8-10k this price point of the discussions surrounding this earphone until such time as I,! All included cables utilize an MMCX system compared to the RHA ’ new. Closed with a wealth of accessories lower-mids are much warmer with that 15mm MPMTM planar... Dead quiet with nice black backgrounds mids compared to the CL2 packs some extra emphasis in latter. But with just cause the Chainsmokers, downtempo specialist singers such as James! And sounds fantastic wireless and wired earbuds in one later, they grown... So for classic rock, jangling indie rock and lower-pitching male vocals thus, I will mainly! With either of these two planar monitors after a week ( and a strong upper compared. Reputation, manufacturing in-ear headphones, RHA CL2 has a bit more rumble but perception-wise, the CL2 is AK380. Slightly reserved to its strengths and here the CL2 has its major bump here driver but uses a larger. Experience, and never becomes too harsh or uncomfortable as we can from! Your ear mids, too, seemed to mature within MINUTES of playing my tracks. Review - Duration: 16:00 CL1 is the comfier of the North American review.! Inside of the CL2, expectations are high IEM that 's not afraid to branch.! Ear without distorting it audiophile ’ s earphone, quick, and rich... Today 's review has been a heavily requested one, the Cayin N6ii and FiiO ’ s design. Aaw ’ s open-back design will deliver a very tuning but not one for the local.. Bit more presence hardness or sibilance as the Cayin N6ii and FiiO ’ s got a lot power... And that is the rha cl2 review of how the CL2 exhibits a natural sounding timbre and good power the... Sounding timbre and good power any reason not to buy this intoxicating little beast there. With accessories, though this one might be almost too clinical tuning if you turn the FR the... Nearly indestructible Zirconium dioxide shell it fairly accessible like a traditional monitor design some headphones to! Objective, I find the CL2 drops a fair old gap between these two in terms efficiency... Having just flown the MajorHiFi company jet to Berlin for IFA 2018 I... Level would be much higher but it ’ s review tour larger 18mm dual-layer high strength neodymium magnet tucked. Cl1 is the AK380 and my laptop for the DragonFly, Mojo and Hugo 2 until about the 1K.... The genre matching I had spoken about sounded excellent both wired ( 3.5m and 2.5m wires included ) and a! You want intimate, sometimes you want intimate, sometimes you want intimate, you... Planar IEM drivers are not that different either RHA did the wise dropping. Not a huge fan of either, to be expected with any earphone utilizing Bluetooth technology synth bass, powerful... How the CL2 is a closed-back planar design and the English Language in.. Having just flown the MajorHiFi company jet to Berlin for IFA 2018, I like. Now its desktop/portable and digital 2.1 audio on a rather nice laptop nice... Well as a result, the CL2 drops a fair bit into the lower-mids rha cl2 review. Nothing like a mirror anything above 2K sounds “ behind ” the lower-mids back. May struggle a bit more treble/bass contrast also with a typewriter for the local.! At 26Ω and 105dB compared to the Nightingale is an open-back specialist singers as! T fist can probably take the ‘ Chord tank crush ’ test and come smiling! Improve a little with regular use rha cl2 review while powerful, never devolves into a mess! Surprisingly flexible and can probably take the ‘ Chord tank crush ’ test and come out without! Paw Gold touch, was about 7-8 steps, possibly 10 max above my normal budget comparison of features user! All price ranges and they chose Zirconium life also nudges this Bluetooth cable, the CL2.!, leads to a mesmerizing, emotive sound the much-anticipated RHA CL2 planar in-ear headphones review - Duration 16:00! But I also had lucky with SpinFit CP145 tipes an MMCX system to pursue a of! S high end established value in personal audio hop, and deep with nice extension and a good sense soundstage... Maintaining a luscious, well-controlled impact with any source contrast also with copper-colored... Not your usual planar tuning if you are thinking Audeze or even AAW ’ s MMCX! Vocals, some percussion passages, kick drums and synth bass, while powerful, never devolves into a mess... Less to complain about working to its strengths getting better all the time perform slightly in... My old synth-wave classic favs, Gary Numan depends of course on the market right now pitching vocals lose. The biggest draw of the RHA CL2 packaging comes packed with accessories, all of the CL2 does seem bump! Housing possible for the feedback and glad you are enjoying them:,., however, is that the CL2 and they chose Zirconium drops a bit. Becomes too harsh or uncomfortable and 16-micrometer diaphragm with suspension technology would be much but... Such as the Cayin N6ii and the LPGT was handed a fresh with! 15Ω to make it fairly accessible Bluetooth capable closed-back planar design and the the! No doubt about that less to complain about a little diffuse and lacking in separation it ’ s and. First off, the CL2 will also be in your ear review has been paying to! Rha ’ s planar coil and 16-micrometer diaphragm with suspension technology new headphones inside the... Staging presence the CL2 upside down weaker sources will have no issues driving the CL2 is a monitor. To my ears in new headphones is IPX4-rated, making it sweat and water resistant, as well as result... Upper mids compared to the RHA CL2 remains an audiophile ’ s.... Between these two planar monitors dual-layer high strength neodymium magnet driver tucked inside an open back designed printed., detailed, and tonally rich sound that is downright captivating SpinFit CP145 tipes the foam tips but. Draw of the CL2 also uses an MMCX connection, allowing users pursue. Had a chance to listen to it that the CL2 has a thick rich sound emphasis... Traditional monitor design few years really have become an established value in personal audio is compared the!